Posts Tagged ‘meme machine’

Analyzing web analytics

21 November, 2008

Couple of days ago I finished the last of this season’s speech and seminar tour. As usual, it’s been a whole lot of fun, but I’m glad I can finally get back to focusing on actually doing stuff.

So, for the first time in a while, I managed to get some reading done and scoured thru a couple of web analytics books that has been in the pipeline for a while. Best one, by far, was “Actionable Web Analytics“, which was the only book focusing on why we should analyze and what to actually do with the numbers, compared to just describing the mechanics how we set up GA or Omniture to output some stuff.

What surprises me the most is how I can’t find a single decent approach to analyzing advertising campaigns that aren’t driven by click-thru. This still seems to be a blind spot, despite the fact that everyone is a metric evangelist these days.

It’s all very web site centric, although GA announced support for distributed apps thru their Flash tracker the other day. Also, the customer analytics vendors have in mind are clearly advertisers or publishers, possibly media agencies, but definitely not creative agencies.

There are simpy no decent tools for creative agencies to use to actually improve the quality of their work. Throwing stuff like KPIs or OKRs at creatives just don’t do it.

So sure, we need our creative briefs to become more data driven, but where are the tools to make us do that? Campaign analytics tools are mostly tied to ad serving vendors, making it very difficult for agencies to learn stuff cross-clients since the data is siloed. And what’s up with the CTR, especially using it as a measure of success for banners with a simple message, such as “This is an ad for diet coke, please buy it”… sheesh. Just because CTR can be measured doesn’t mean it’s relevant.

And also, how difficult can it be for ad serving vendors add plug and play tracking for exposure time, hover, non-CTR events etc etc.? And how come there’s no dead easy way to get insights on what frequencies, media context or individual characteristics (geodemo or psychographics) what seems to trigger different types of responses?

Gah, do I have to create everything myself? ;)

Upcoming keynote on Infusion (Amsterdam, NL) – on remixing and reactive ads

5 November, 2008

I’m going to Amsterdam next week to deliver a keynote on the Infusion conference, on how we can create more entertaining, clever and persuasive marketing by applying lessons from electronica music, gaming, social media, web mashups and advertising from the late 60s.

Naturally, I will focus to some extent on reactive ads, but mostly I’ll put reactive ads in context of the larger trend of the remix culture, drawing parallels between punk music and intellectual property pirates etc. It’ll be a hoot. If you happen to be there, don’t miss it or at least, e-mail (vonsydow AT byburt.com) or tweet me and we’ll grab coffee!

Gustav and Gustav – Reactive advertising, Web 2.0 Berlin

24 October, 2008

Came home yesterday from Web 2.0 Europe after delivering the first of a series of speeches on the topic of “Reactive advertising”, which is mine and Gustav Martners idea on how to improve the ad model for brand marketing online and better monetize the social media space in one big swoop.

Case you happened to not be there, here are the slides from “Reactive advertising”!

(stupid wordpress.com won’t let me embed them right in the blog)

Reactive advertising – a meme is born

2 July, 2008

We’ve been doing some stuff based on this concept for the last year or so and have ben struggling on what to call it. The name “reactive ads” sort of emerged over time, and since we recently got acceptet to speak at Web 2.0 Europe with “Reactive advertising” as the topic, and I spoke at Google two days ago and used that term, I figured I might aswell get it out there ;)

So what is “Reactive advertising”?

Most efforts today in Internet ad technology are focused on one thing – optimizing targeting based on varous forms of data. And sure enough, the Internet has us swimming in data, flooding marketers with opportunities for better targeting, media planning and measurement. However, these improvements overshoots what most marketers are able to utilize. Instead, what now needs to be improved is getting consumers’ attention and creating impact.

Besides being able to collect and structure massive amounts of data, the Internet also gives us the opportunity to tailor our message and the contents and characteristics of our ads to each specific user.
This can’t be done in either print, TV or radio. And it’s a completely different thing than putting up an ad in front of the right person.

Enter “reactive advertising” – ads adjusting the contents to optimize performance based on the conditions of each unique exposure.

Reactive ads shifts the use of data from improving targeting, to improving the ads themselves. It can leverage information that is most often completely useless or too fine grained to be of practical use for media planning purposes, not to find our target audience, but to talk to them in a more compelling way.

Campaign can unfold in ways that are more dynamic and persuasive than ever before. Stories can be told in a way that’s more participatory and dynamic than ever before. With so much advertising these days cluttering our lives and dumb us down, reactive advertising presents a real opportunity to make ads that are not only relevant, but also more intelligent and entertaining.

Reactive ads is the start of a new creative revolution, driven by technology and a world of endless data. We’ve seen from research and the trial campaigns we’ve run using Meme Machine by Burt (still in prototype stages), that reactive ads have the potential to completely redefine how much impact that can be delivered in one single exposure.

In early fall, we’ll be rolling out a beta release for a select number of agencies to try for their clients. If you’re interested in tagging along or just want more information on this concept, send me an e-mail at gustav (a) vonsydow.tv?